European Union (EU) consumers are “exporting” negative environmental impacts to their Eastern European neighbours, whilst keeping the bulk of economic benefits linked to consuming goods and services, a new study reveals.
The study, “Ecologically unequal exchanges driven by EU consumption”, which was published in Nature Sustainability, states that although the environmental impacts of EU consumption are felt around the world, countries in Eastern Europe have experienced the highest environmental pressures and impacts associated with EU citizens’ consumption.
Researchers at the Universities of Birmingham (UK), Groningen (NL) and Maryland (US), as well as the Chinese Academy of Sciences, also analysed value added by consumption of goods and services within the current 27 EU member countries to economies between 1995 and 2019.
The study contends that large shares of 10 major environmental pressures and impacts are “outsourced” to countries and regions outside the EU while more than 85% of the economic benefits remain within member countries – albeit with uneven distribution of costs and benefits within the EU.
The study was based on the work of an international group of researchers who studied environmental indicators between 1995 and 2019.
These indicators included greenhouse gas emissions, material consumption, land use, consumption of surface and ground water, particulate matter formation, photochemical oxidation and biodiversity loss due to land coverage, as well as freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecotoxicity, the University of Birmingham says.
The benefits of EU consumption are greater for most member countries than those outside the Union.
Researchers found that seven analysed pressures and impacts – ecotoxicity indicators, greenhouse gas emissions, particulate matter formation, photochemical oxidation and material consumption – increased notably outside the EU while decreasing within the bloc.
Greenpeace Germany provided support with the initial data analysis, modelling and discussions as part of the project “Outsourced Environmental Degradation of the EU”, the University of Birmingham says.
The university continues that the research was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Shandong Natural Science Foundation, and the Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China.
Eastern Europe also consistently ranked as the region receiving the lowest share of economic value added compared to environmental pressures and impacts associated with EU consumption, the study shows.
Pressures and impacts induced by EU consumption dropped in most of its member states – for the Netherlands and Sweden, indicators in all ten categories dropped from 1995 to 2019. Austria, Czechia, Italy, Poland, Romania and Slovenia all saw decreases in nine of ten analysed environmental pressures and impacts.
For the sake of our planet, environmental pressures and impacts from EU consumption need to decrease substantially.
In contrast, all analysed impacts and pressures associated with EU consumption increased in Brazil, China, India and Japan, as well as in Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
Corresponding author Yuli Shan, associate Professor in Sustainable Transitions at the University of Birmingham, commented: “For the sake of our planet, environmental pressures and impacts from EU consumption need to decrease substantially – reducing the export of environmental damage beyond the borders of the wealthy EU states to poorer regions.
“The benefits of EU consumption are greater for most member countries than those outside the Union, whilst inducing higher environmental pressures and impacts for the EU’s eastern neighbours such as Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Ukraine and Moldova.”
