US government urged to take tougher stance in UN plastic treaty

 

Plastic pollution

Ten US states on Friday called for the United States federal government to advocate for stronger measures in an upcoming United Nations plastic treaty.

They are urging the US delegation to support a global pact that not only includes caps on plastic production but also rejects what they describe as “false” recycling solutions and prioritises the welfare of communities impacted by plastic production.

The appeal, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James and joined by attorneys general from states including California, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts, was sent ahead of the final round of negotiations on the treaty, scheduled to take place later this month in Busan, South Korea.

In their letter, they urged the US delegation to extend its position beyond production caps, which had been a notable shift in the US stance following its initial opposition to such limits.

“I applaud our nation’s delegation to INC-5 for their support of a global plastics treaty that will establish meaningful caps on plastic production,” stated the letter. “I encourage the delegation to heed our additional recommendations so we can build toward a more sustainable future.”

As reported by Reuters, the question of restricting plastic production was a central point of contention during the last round of treaty negotiations in Ottawa in April, where prolonged discussions saw pushback from major plastic-producing nations, including Saudi Arabia and China.

These countries argued that the treaty should focus on managing plastic waste rather than capping production, which they deemed less contentious.

In addition to production limits, the letter also called for the treaty to formally recognise the connection between plastic pollution and climate change and to promote the establishment of a plastic reuse system.

The push from state leaders comes after California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against Exxon Mobil in September, accusing the company of misleading the public on the effectiveness of recycling in addressing plastic pollution.

Privacy Overview
Circular Online

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is temporarily stored in your browser and helps our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

More information about our Cookie Policy

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality and the website cannot be used properly without them. These cookies include session cookies and persistent cookies.

Session cookies keep track of your current visit and how you navigate the site. They only last for the duration of your visit and are deleted from your device when you close your browser.

Persistent cookies last after you’ve closed your Internet browser and enable our website to recognise you as a repeat visitor and remember your actions and preferences when you return.

Functional cookies

Third party cookies include performance cookies and targeting cookies.

Performance cookies collect information about how you use a website, e.g. which pages you go to most often, and if you get error messages from web pages. These cookies don’t collect information that identifies you personally as a visitor, although they might collect the IP address of the device you use to access the site.

Targeting cookies collect information about your browsing habits. They are usually placed by advertising networks such as Google. The cookies remember that you have visited a website and this information is shared with other organisations such as media publishers.

Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website and display content that is more relevant to you and your interests across the Google content network.

Send this to a friend